Mark Scheme

L1:

The answer is based on either own knowledge or sources. It is likely to be generalised, descriptive and/or assertive, and with little focus on the question.
[1–6 marks]

L2:

The answer may be based on relevant selection of material either from the sources or from own knowledge, or they may be combined. The answer will be mainly descriptive about the consequences of the dissolution, with limited links to the question about the extent to which the consequences were social; or the answer may be explicit about the question but containing limited supporting evidence and argument.
[7–11 marks]

L3:

The answer shows developed understanding of the consequences of the dissolution of the monasteries, using material both from the sources and from own knowledge. The answer is likely to lack depth or balance in assessing the extent to which the consequences were primarily social, but it will be a relevant response, and there will be some understanding of interpretations.
[12–16 marks]

L4:

The answer shows explicit understanding of the demands of the question, and provides a balanced explanation of the consequences of the dissolution of the monasteries. There will be a good understanding of a range of factors, all clearly related to the question, and there will be a conclusion, though it may not be detailed or in depth.
[17–21 marks]

L5:

The answer is well focused and closely argued – supported by precise use of evidence from the sources and own knowledge. There will be a well-developed understanding and clear, precise explanation of a range of consequences, leading to a balanced and explained judgement in relation to the question of the extent to which the consequences were primarily social.
[22–24 marks]